| |
IntroductionThe Child Welfare Partnership (CWP) at Portland State University provides educational, training, and research assistance to SOSCF. The research component of the CWP conducts research to recognize the changing client population, provide statistical models for deploying and redeploying staff, and optimizing the use of limited resources. These studies enable SOSCF administration to make informed decisions about serving this needy population of Oregonians. This report profiles the client population served by SOSCF branch offices. The “Cohort Studies” profile a group of children entering substitute care during a period of time. This report profiles children entering long-term foster care from mid-1992 to 1995; the profiles include parental problems or conditions, child problems, child’s age, severity of maltreatment, barriers affecting family reunification, and services offered to families. The long-term population profiled in this report are children who are in care for at least 14 days during the year after their removal. About 80% of the children entering foster care in Oregon are considered long-term cases; the remaining 20% are quickly returned home and do not remain in foster care for an extended period. MethodsReason for Removal
Child's Age GroupsIn Oregon, children ages 0-4 years represent 29% of the child population, children ages 5-9 years represent 28% of the child population, children 10-14 years represent 28% of the child population, and children 15-17 years represent 16% of the child population. For the population of children entering foster care, nearly half are 0-5 years, 29% are ages 6-12 years, and 23% are ages 13-17 years. A disproportionate number of preschool children are in long-term foster care. Reuniting families with young children is a difficult decision -- the youngest children are the most vulnerable to serious maltreatment, however, parent-child bonding is most important when children are young. The age of the child victim is one of the most important variables in child welfare. The age of children entering care is continually decreasing as limited resources prohibit serving all needy children and families. SOSCF is forced to prioritize families with the greatest need or most likely to severely maltreat their child. This trend is expected to continue as the demand for child welfare services continues to outstrip the agency’s ability to serve maltreating families.
Level of VulnerabilityLevel 1 cases involve the most severe types of child maltreatment. Child maltreatment related fatalities, fractured skulls, brain damaged children resulting from shaken baby syndrome, severely drug affected infants, abandoned children, and severely sexually abused children are all considered level 1. Level 2 cases involve younger children exposed to chronic neglect, severe emotional abuse, moderate physical abuse, and children left with babysitters whose parents do not return. Level 3 cases often involve treatment for children or treatment for parents. Children with severe emotional disturbances, physical/medical handicaps, mental problems, and child sexual offenders requiring treatment are all considered level 3. In addition, parental incarceration, parental hospitalization, and parental detoxification treatment are all categorized as level 3. Level 4 cases are milder forms of child maltreatment to young children (ages 0-5 years) and more severe forms of child maltreatment to older children (ages 13-17 years). Level 5 and level 6 cases include mild and moderate maltreatment to older children. Level 7 cases have traditionally been recognized as out of control teenagers. In addition to the chronic acting out teenagers, level 7 cases involve mild physical abuse, mild neglect, juvenile delinquents, and voluntary requests for placement. Fewer and fewer level 7 children are being served by SOSCF; other community agencies are provided resources to serve this population of children and parents.
Child ProblemsMost of the older children entering foster care exhibit problems. Although younger children tend to exhibit fewer problems, many younger children later develop behaviors or problems related to the maltreatment. Thus, although 85% of the children entering foster care do exhibit problems, some not identified with problems will later exhibit problems. These estimates are considered conservative and reflect the proportion of children entering foster care who exhibit problems in the year after the removal. Problems exhibited by children entering foster care are important to profile. More problematic children require more extensive treatment and require more skilled providers. Foster parents will need more training and skills, residential treatment facilities will require more intensive services for more extended periods, and matching of children to prospective adoptive families will require more efforts to minimize disruption rates.
Family FactorsSome family factors increase the likelihood a child will be placed in foster care; other family factors increase the likelihood a child will be seriously maltreated. Unemployment, drug/alcohol involvement, criminal involvement, and inadequate housing increase the likelihood of a foster care placement. These family factors are much more common with the population of children in foster care than the population being served in-home. There are other parental characteristics associated with the risk of serious maltreatment. Mothers with young infants who are mentally ill are more susceptible to seriously maltreating their child. Father figures who are criminally involved and prone to violent acts are more likely to seriously maltreat a child. The factors below include the more important factors associated with risk of a child entering foster care and /or risk of serious maltreatment. When these factors are common in a community, the number of children entering care and the number of serious maltreatment cases are expected to be higher than other communities.
Parental BarriersAll barriers influencing a child’s return home have been identified for each family. When a single barrier is selected for children not returning home, the most important barriers preventing family reunification can be identified. Parental drug involvement (27%), a parent unwilling to be a parental resource (10%), a parent who cannot be located (7%), mental condition (7%), chronic neglect (6%), and alcohol abuse (6%) are the most important parental barriers that prevent a child from returning home. Communities where these barriers are common will have more difficulty returning children home.
Parental ServicesThere are 38 different services provided to maltreating parents that are recognized by the Cohort Study. The fifteen most common services constitute 80% of the services provided. The average family is provided with four services to the parent(s). About 50% of those services are completed by either parent, about 25% are partially competed, and about 25% are not attended. Most of the common services listed below are associated with promoting family reunification or minimizing re-abuse. Visitation, parent training, drug/alcohol treatment, counseling, and alcoholics/narcotics anonymous are all associated with higher return home rates. Low return home rates are associated with parents who do not participate with services. Although many services are associated with increased numbers of children returning home, fewer services are associated with lower re-abuse rates. Parent training, drug/alcohol inpatient treatment, individual counseling, and alcoholic/narcotics anonymous are all associated with lower re-abuse rates. Most services require full parental participation to decrease re-abuse rate. A full report on service effectiveness can be obtained from the Child Welfare Partnership (503-315-4268).
Child ServicesChildren ages 0-5 years average one services in the year after their removal, children ages 6-12 years average 1.9 services, and children ages 13-17 years average 2.2 services. The most common services provided in all age groups is individual counseling. Individual counseling to very young children might be substantially different from individual counseling provided to a teenager. About half the children ages 6-12 years are provided individual counseling, about one in five receives a psychological examination, and about 1 in 6 receive an individualized education plan (IEP). These three services represent about half the services provided to children ages 6-12 years. Children ages 13-17 years are the smallest population of children entering foster care yet each child tends to receive more services. Individual counseling is provided to half the children ages 13-17 years, one-quarter are provided psychological examinations and residential treatment, about 16% receive independent living, and about one in nine receive drug/alcohol treatment, an individualized education plan, sexual abuse treatment, and drug/alcohol evaluations.
Jefferson SummaryThe most common reasons children enter foster care in Oregon are neglect (25%), parental absence (17%), threat of harm (13%), physical abuse (11%), and treatment issues of the child (11%). Statewide these five reasons account for 77% of the removals; in Jefferson County these same five reasons account for 82% of the children entering foster care. Reasons children enter foster care in Jefferson County differ significantly from the statewide estimates. In Jefferson County the most common reason for removal is child treatment needs (34%), which is more than three times the state estimate. Neglect is the second most common reason for removal in Jefferson County (29%), which is slightly higher than the state estimate. Parental absence, threat of harm, and physical abuse are removal reasons less common in Jefferson County when compared to the state estimates. Parental absence includes situations where the caretaker is incarcerated and where the caretaker leaves a child with a babysitter well beyond the prescribed time. Threat of harm includes situations where a child is at risk for abuse or neglect (e.g. perpetrator residing in the home) although child maltreatment has not occurred. Children entering foster care are categorized into three groups--children ages 0-5 years, children ages 6-12 years, and children ages 13-17 years. Of the children entering foster care in Oregon 48% are ages 0-5 years, 29% are ages 6-12 years, and 23% are ages 13-17 years. The age groups served in Jefferson County differ considerably from the state profile. When compared to the statewide estimates, Jefferson County SCF serves an older child population. In Jefferson County, 28% of the children are within the youngest age group, 30% within the mid age group, and 41% with the oldest age group. Level of vulnerability is a child welfare profiling system which considers the severity of abuse and the age of the child. Younger and more severely maltreated children are identified as the most vulnerable (levels 1-3) and older, less severely abused children are considered less vulnerable (levels 4-7). Statewide almost 82% of children entering long term foster care are identified as levels 1-3, whereas in Jefferson County this estimate is 86%. Jefferson County mimics the state for level 1 cases (15%), serves fewer level 2 cases (22% verses 31%) but more level 3 cases (49% verses 35%) when compared to the statewide profile. Within each level of vulnerability there are numerous sub levels which accurately describe why children enter foster care. Although the limited number of observations prohibits definitive comparisons between the county and statewide profiles, there are some observations worth noting. Within level 1 severe sexual abuse is the most common reason children are entering care in Jefferson County (7%), and statewide (6%). Within level 2, the estimate of children entering foster care due to chronic neglect is also similar for both Jefferson County statewide (15%). There are a few notable differences between Oregon and Jefferson County for cases identified as level 3. Child requiring residential treatment (22% verses 7%), and care due to child's severe emotional disturbance (7% verses 2%) are removal reasons considerably higher in Jefferson County than statewide. Also, chronic neglect to school aged children is slightly higher in Jefferson County (7% verses 5%) and parental incarceration is slightly lower in Jefferson County (5% verse 9%) when compared to the statewide estimates. The effects of abuse, neglect, and family separation often result in problems for children entering foster care. Some children are identified with no problems while others have one or more mental, physical or behavioral problems. Children served in Jefferson County are more likely to be identified with problems when compared to other children in different parts of the state. Only 4% of the children entering foster care in Jefferson County are identified with no problems; this estimate is much lower than the statewide estimate (15%). Victim of sexual abuse (27%), angry/aggressive behavior (27%), and out of control/acting out (26%) are the most common child problems identified in Oregon. In Jefferson County, out of control/acting out (42%), victim of sexual abuse (37%), and exposure to domestic violence (34%) are the most common child problems. Most child problems in Jefferson County tend to have higher estimates than elsewhere in Oregon. This reflects the older child population served in Jefferson County. For instance, Jefferson County tends to serve more children who are academically delayed (26% verses 15%), who are depressed (22% verses 12%), who abuse alcohol (16% verses 7%), and who abuse drugs (15% verses 7%). Parents who maltreat their children often have problems or conditions that affect their parenting. These problems and conditions are known as family factors. The most common family factor identified for families served by SOSCF in Jefferson County and Oregon is poor parenting. This factor was present in 72% of families statewide and 66% in Jefferson County. Chronic neglect is the second most pervasive factor statewide (57%) and is similar in Jefferson County (55%). About half the parents statewide and 44% of the parents served in Jefferson County are single. Also, half the parents served statewide abuse drugs, whereas, fewer of the parents served in Jefferson County (44%) abuse drugs. In Jefferson County 60% of the families served abuse alcohol, statewide this family factor is less pervasive (43%). Other family factors in Jefferson County which tend to be higher in prevalence when compared to the statewide estimates include past CPS removal (55% verses 39%), overwhelming child care (40% verses 28%), divorce/marital problems (35% verses 16%), and domestic violence (42% verses 31%). Statewide there tends to be more parents who were teens at the birth of their first child (45% verses 29%), more unemployment (39% verses 33%), more recent pregnancy/new babies (19% verses 2%), and more parents with a history of abuse to children (29% verses 22%) than Jefferson County. Barriers are problems or situations that affect the likelihood of a child returning home. Often, barriers are related to the parental problems that caused the child's placement in foster care. Although the agency recognizes both child and parental barriers, typically the parental barriers determine if a child returns home. The most common barriers for caretakers statewide are drug involvement (36%), chronic neglect (19%), and alcohol abuse (16%). In Jefferson County drug involvement (34%) is similar to the statewide estimate, chronic neglect is higher (32%), as is alcohol abuse (39%). Poor parenting supervision (16% verses 8%) tends to be higher in Jefferson County, and angry/aggressive behavior is a barrier slightly less pervasive in Jefferson County (7%) than elsewhere in Oregon (12%). Mental condition is a barrier affecting 10% of the families with children entering foster care in Jefferson County and Oregon. The most common child barrier for Jefferson County and Oregon is out of control behavior. This child barrier is significantly more prevalent in Jefferson County (24%) than statewide (12%). Another common child barrier is mental/emotional condition, which is also higher in Jefferson County (17%) than statewide (11%). Most child barriers in Jefferson County tend to be significantly higher than statewide. Nearly half the children sampled statewide show no barriers; in Jefferson County 40% of the children show no barriers. Services are offered to families to resolve issues that brought the child into care, minimize the potential for reabuse, reduce the effects of maltreatment on the child and increase the chance of family reunification. Services are provided through community agencies and directly by SOSCF. Visitation is the most common service provided to parents in Oregon (68%) and in Jefferson County (67%). Parent training is the second most common service offered statewide (44%) and in Jefferson County (42%). Drug/alcohol evaluations are services offered to just under 40% of the parents served statewide and in Jefferson County. About one-third of the parents served statewide are provided psychological examinations, whereas, 27% of the families served in Jefferson County are offered this service. Drug/alcohol outpatient treatment is a service offered to nearly one-quarter of the families served in Jefferson County and statewide. Drug/alcohol inpatient treatment is offered to one-quarter of the statewide population, and to just under 30% in Jefferson County. Services offered more frequently in Jefferson County when compared to the state profile include individual counseling (29% verses 19%), AA/NA (22% verses 15%), marital counseling (10% verses 2%), transportation (18% verses 14%). Estimates for family counseling, and family unity are similar for Jefferson County and the state. Anger management is a service offered to 13% of the statewide population; in Jefferson County this service was not documented in any cases sampled. Services to children are intended to minimize the effects of maltreatment and modify behavior. More services are offered to SOSCF children in Jefferson County than elsewhere in Oregon. The most common service offered to children entering foster care in Jefferson County (34%), and statewide (32%) is individual counseling. Residential treatment (31% verses 10%), mental health (18% verses 6%), drug/alcohol evaluations (15% verses 3%), drug/alcohol treatment (12% verses 3%) individual education plans (17% verses 10%) and EPSDT (15% verses 6%) are services offered more often to children entering foster care in Jefferson County than statewide. In Jefferson County, psychological examinations (15%) and sexual abuse treatment (under 10%) are services with estimates which mimic the state profile. The Jefferson County SOSCF Branch and their community partners serve families at risk, protect vulnerable children, and prevent reabuse. By working to diminish abuse and neglect, the agency endeavors to preserve the emotional and physical well being of children and families and to promote healthier family functioning. Comments/suggestions to: Web Editor
|